Examines the potential global consequences of a second Trump presidency. It assesses how his leadership could exacerbate interconnected economic, geopolitical, environmental, and social risks, potentially destabilizing a fragile global order. How Donald Trump’s Reelection Could Amplify Global Inter-systemic Risk.

Key Findings

1. Amplification of Global Risks:
   • Economic Impact: A likely trade war with China, triggered by increased U.S. tariffs and retaliatory measures, could slow global economic growth, increase inflation, and create financial instability.
   • Geopolitical Tensions: Weakened U.S. engagement in multilateral institutions (e.g., Paris Climate Agreement, WHO) could undermine global governance, reduce international cooperation on crises, and stimulate regional arms races.
   • Climate and Environmental Setbacks: A rollback of climate policies and withdrawal from international agreements would increase U.S. carbon emissions, worsening global climate action efforts.
   • Pandemic Preparedness: Potential mismanagement of future pandemics due to ideological appointments and disinformation could hinder effective responses.
2. Authoritarian Contagion:
   • Domestically, Trump’s consolidation of power over key institutions (e.g., the military and the Department of Justice) could erode democratic norms.
   • Internationally, his example may embolden authoritarian leaders and weaken democratic governance globally.
3. Global Polycrisis Risk:
   • Warns that these actions could interact with existing stresses (e.g., climate change, economic inequality) to trigger a “global polycrisis”—a cascade of interconnected crises that amplify one another.
4. Critical Junctures:
   • Identifies key moments where Trump’s policies could catalyze systemic changes with long-term global consequences. These include shifts in trade dynamics, security alliances, and environmental commitments.

Strategic Recommendations

• Global Response: Emphasizes the importance of proactive responses from other nations, multilateral organizations, and civil society to mitigate risks. This includes strengthening alliances, accelerating climate action independently of U.S. policies, and reinforcing democratic norms.
• Preparedness for Feedback Loops: Policymakers are urged to anticipate how Trump’s actions might create self-reinforcing feedback loops that worsen systemic vulnerabilities.

Overview

1. Introduction

Examines the potential consequences of Donald Trump’s reelection in the 2024 U.S. presidential election. It establishes a framework for analyzing the possible global impacts, emphasizing how different risks interconnect and why a systemic approach is essential.

• Radical Political Influence: Discusses how Trump’s political influence reshapes the probability distributions of global risks, stretching them into previously considered unlikely extremes. This influence extends beyond the U.S., affecting global systems.
• Focus on Inter-systemic Risks: Aims to assess diverse and interconnected global inter-systemic risks that could arise from a second Trump presidency. It emphasizes the need for a comprehensive analysis beyond first-order impacts on specific U.S. policy areas, such as defense and immigration.
• Analytical Framework: Employs analytical tools derived from complex systems science to explore these potential consequences. This includes a stress-trigger-crisis model to differentiate between slow-moving stresses and fast-moving trigger events and a causal-loop analysis to identify feedback loops across global systems.
• Expert Insights: Integrates evidence and opinions gathered from informed commentary and interviews with experts, including those with conservative viewpoints. It acknowledges the influence of the authors’ values and beliefs on the analysis while aiming for transparency and critique.
• Future Updates: Concludes by mentioning plans to release an updated assessment in late October, indicating the evolving nature of the analysis as the election approaches.

2. Impact assessment

Evaluates the potential consequences of a second Trump presidency across various domains. Moreover, it emphasizes that these impacts could have significant repercussions for global systems, which are analyzed in greater detail in subsequent sections of the report.

• Personality and Psychological Concerns: Discusses Mr. Trump’s impulsive and unpredictable nature, which could lead to crises or hinder effective responses to global challenges. There are also worries about his cognitive decline, which may impair decision-making in critical situations.
• Loss of Institutional Guardrails: Highlights fears that a second Trump administration would dismiss many government officials seen as obstacles, replacing them with loyalists. This could facilitate a more radical policy agenda than during his first term.

The assessment further explores specific policy impacts under three broad headings:

• Institutional Capture and Authoritarianism: Concerns about deepening authoritarian practices in the U.S. political system.
• Socio-Economic Turmoil: Potential disruptions in economic, energy, climate, and health systems.
• International Conflict and Insecurity: The likelihood of increased tensions and conflicts on a global scale.

2.1 Institutional capture and deepening American authoritarinism

Examines the potential for a second Trump presidency to reshape U.S. government institutions in a more authoritarian manner. Also, it underscores the dangers of shifting towards authoritarianism in the U.S. political landscape, which could have far-reaching implications for domestic governance and international relations.

• Institutional Capture: Suggests that Trump may attempt to seize control of various government institutions, transforming them to align with his political agenda. This could involve appointing loyalists to key positions, undermining the independence of agencies, and eroding checks and balances.
• Authoritarian Practices: Analysts express concern that Trump could implement more authoritarian measures, potentially using violent repression to maintain power and suppress dissent. This could manifest in policies that limit civil liberties and undermine democratic norms.
• Impact on Governance: Highlights the risks associated with such institutional changes, including the potential for increased political polarization, the weakening of democratic institutions, and the erosion of public trust in government.

2.2 Socio-economic turmoil

Examines how a second Trump presidency could worsen existing economic vulnerabilities, both domestically and globally. It emphasizes how interconnected socio-economic factors could create widespread instability, with Trump administration policies potentially triggering significant disruptions to the U.S. and global economies.

• Economic Proposals: Indicates that Trump’s economic policies could increase inflation and weaken the U.S. economy. This deterioration could have ripple effects throughout the global economy, affecting trade and investment.
• Labor Market Disruptions: The potential for mass deportations and restrictive immigration policies could create labor shortages in critical sectors, particularly agriculture. This could further strain the economy and increase public resentment towards immigrants, exacerbating social tensions.
• Emigration as Protest: Suggests that extreme policies could drive liberal elites to emigrate in large numbers, normalizing emigration as a form of protest against the administration. This could result in significant economic losses and contribute to a broader trend of discontent.
• Feedback Loops: Discusses how these socio-economic challenges could create feedback loops, worsening the economic situation and potentially leading to instability and unrest.

2.3 International conflict and security

Analyzes how a second Trump presidency could affect global security and international relations. It demonstrates that such a presidency may intensify international conflicts and weaken global security structures, leading to a more dangerous geopolitical environment.

• Increased Geopolitical Tensions: Trump’s foreign policy approach could heighten tensions with key global players, particularly China and Russia. His administration’s inclination towards unilateralism and confrontation may lead to deteriorating diplomatic relations.
• Trade Wars and Economic Conflicts: The potential for renewed trade wars, especially with China, is highlighted as a significant risk. Such conflicts could disrupt global supply chains, increase economic instability, and provoke retaliatory measures from other nations, further escalating tensions.
• Arms Races and Security Dilemmas: Discusses the likelihood of arms races as nations respond to perceived threats from the U.S. and each other. This could create security dilemmas, where defensive measures by one country are viewed as aggressive by another, leading to a cycle of escalation.
• Decline of Multilateralism: A second Trump administration could further weaken multilateral institutions and agreements, undermining global cooperation on critical issues such as climate change, security, and trade. This decline could leave nations more vulnerable to conflicts.
• Impact on Global Stability: Warns that combining these factors could lead to a more unstable and conflict-prone international environment, with significant global security and cooperation implications.

3. Feedback assessment

Examines potential feedback loops that could arise from a second Trump presidency and their role in intensifying global inter-systemic risks. This section emphasizes the need to understand and address how these feedback loops can magnify risks throughout our highly interconnected world, particularly under disruptive leadership.

• Identification of Feedback Loops: Identifies at least eight significant feedback loops that could emerge from Trump’s policies first—and second-order impacts. These loops represent interconnected crises that could amplify each other, leading to a more severe global polycrisis.
• Cascading Effects: Discusses how the interactions among these feedback loops could create cascading effects, where one crisis triggers another, resulting in a complex web of simultaneous challenges. This interconnectedness could overwhelm existing systems and responses.
• Global Polycrisis: Emphasizes that the combination of these feedback loops could escalate into a new and more perilous phase of global polycrisis, characterized by multiple crises co-occurring, which would have devastating consequences for human welfare and global stability.
• Historical Context: The analysis parallels historical instances where similar feedback mechanisms led to significant global disruptions, underscoring the importance of understanding these dynamics in the context of current geopolitical and socio-economic stresses.

3.1 Eight possible vicious cycles in global systems

Outlines the interconnected feedback loops that could emerge from the policies and actions of a second Trump administration, potentially leading to widespread global crises. It emphasizes the importance of understanding these vicious cycles as potential pathways to severe global disruptions and highlights the need for proactive measures to mitigate their impacts.

• Identification of Vicious Cycles: Identifies eight specific vicious cycles that could arise, each representing a self-reinforcing loop where adverse outcomes exacerbate one another. These cycles illustrate how various crises can interconnect and amplify their effects.
• Economic and Political Feedback: Highlights how economic downturns, trade wars, and rising authoritarianism could create feedback loops that worsen global economic conditions and political stability. For instance, a trade war could lead to economic recession, fueling political unrest and further protectionist measures.
• Decline of Multilateralism: A significant theme is the decline of multilateral cooperation, which could weaken global governance structures and increase the likelihood of conflicts. The absence of collaborative frameworks could exacerbate crises as nations retreat into self-help strategies.
• Security Dilemmas: Discusses how escalating tensions and arms races could create security dilemmas, where nations feel compelled to increase their military capabilities in response to perceived threats, leading to further instability.
• Global Polycrisis: The interconnected nature of these vicious cycles suggests that they could contribute to a broader global polycrisis, where multiple crises co-occur, overwhelming existing systems and responses.

3.2 From a second Trump Presidency to an escalated global polycrisis

Examines how a second Trump administration’s policies and actions could significantly escalate global crises, leading to a complex, interconnected global polycrisis. This section outlines potential pathways from a second Trump presidency to heightened global instability, highlighting the urgent need for preventive measures.

• Cascading Crises: Discusses how the various feedback loops and vicious cycles identified earlier could interact to create cascading crises. These crises would affect the United States and have profound global stability and security implications.
• Interconnectedness of Issues: Emphasizes the interconnected nature of economic, political, and environmental challenges. For example, economic downturns could exacerbate social tensions, leading to political instability, which could provoke international conflicts.
• Historical Parallels: The report parallels historical global crises, such as the lead-up to World War II, highlighting how similar patterns of rising authoritarianism, economic inequality, and geopolitical tensions can culminate in widespread conflict and instability.
• Role of Leadership: Underscores the role of leadership in shaping these dynamics. Trump’s impulsive decision-making style and radical political agenda could further destabilize existing systems, making responses to crises more unpredictable and extreme.
• Urgency for Action: The analysis concludes with a call for urgent action to address these interconnected risks. It stresses the importance of international cooperation and robust governance structures to mitigate the potential for a severe global polycrisis.

3.3 Conclusion: Historical parallels and uncertain futures

Examines the potential consequences of a second Trump presidency by analyzing historical events and today’s global landscape. This section synthesizes the report’s key themes, showing how historical lessons interact with the uncertainties of our current global situation.

• Historical Context: Compares current global tensions with early 20th-century crises, noting how today’s inequality, authoritarianism, and health challenges mirror pre-WWII conditions that could lead to renewed global conflict.
• Nuclear Threats and Climate Change: Unlike past crises, the current geopolitical environment is complicated by the presence of nuclear weapons and the urgent challenges posed by climate change. These factors increase the stakes of international conflicts and the potential for catastrophic outcomes.
• Systemic Risks: Emphasizes that the risks associated with a second Trump administration cannot be understood in isolation. Trump’s leadership style, characterized by unpredictability and volatility, could generate new crisis triggers and exacerbate existing tensions within global systems.
• Collective Action: Stresses that the future trajectory of global stability will depend not only on the actions of individual leaders but also on the collective response of nations. Cooperating and addressing shared challenges will determine whether the world descends into crisis or finds pathways to resilience.
• Call for Reflection: Ends with a call for reflection on the lessons of history and the importance of fostering international cooperation to navigate the challenges ahead. It underscores the need for proactive measures to mitigate risks and promote stability in an increasingly interconnected world.

Moreover. Henceforth. Nevertheless. Nonetheless. Moreover. Henceforth. Nevertheless. Nonetheless. Moreover. Henceforth. Nevertheless. Nonetheless.